Huffington Post has a pretty funny slideshow of presidents without shirts on. Now, most of these pictures are fine, but I have to ask two questions: 1. Why is Nancy Reagan's top sooo low. No one wants to imagine, let alone see, what dwells under her clothing; 2. Is the former Chinese president being helped out of the water or kidnapped? In either case, what is the explanation?
Somehow Obama's and Clinton's pictures are the only ones that do not creep me out. Perhaps that is a product of my own familiarity (I can test this hypothesis by finding a topless Bush 43 picture and gauging my level of revulsion, though it would be hard to discern the basis of my disgust); perhaps they are not the physical monsters that many presidents have been (Taft, I am looking in your direction). Whatever the reason, I am glad that we do not have to see Reagan without a shirt ever again.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Posts
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDelete1) who do those legs Clinton is swimming with belong to?
ReplyDelete2) both Reagans in swimwear = terrifying
3) Bart, I can't wait until you're forced to explain a Google search for "Geroge H.W. bush topless" in your browser history to whomever is bound to stumble upon it.